Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Tanya Chan (C) stated this was “the saddest day in Hong Kong history”

Pro-democracy activists say they worry “the end of Hong Kong”, after China introduced plans for a brand new security law.

The US stated the transfer may be “highly destabilising” and undermine China’s obligations on Hong Kong’s autonomy.

China’s National People’s Congress will on Friday debate the law, geared toward banning sedition and subversion.

Supporters say it’s wanted to deal with the violence in political protests that erupted final yr. Opponents worry it would be used to take away fundamental freedoms.

Why has the transfer brought on such a furore?

Hong Kong has noticed a “one country, two systems” coverage and a “high degree of autonomy” since Britain returned sovereignty to China in 1997.

But activists, and the pro-democracy motion, really feel that that is being undermined by Beijing.

  • What is the Basic Law and the way does it work?
  • Why are there protests in Hong Kong? All the context you want

Last yr, tens of millions took to the streets over seven months to protest in opposition to a invoice that may have allowed extraditions to mainland China. Many of the protests turned violent. The invoice was finally paused, after which withdrawn.

China security law 'could be end of Hong Kong'

Media playback is unsupported in your system

Media captionThe BBC’s Helier Cheung on Hong Kong’s 2019 protests

The security law is extra controversial nonetheless. According to the Basic Law, the territory’s mini-constitution, Hong Kong’s authorities was itself alleged to have handed nationwide security laws. However, an try in 2003 failed after 500,000 folks took to the streets in opposition.

That is why an try now to pressure by nationwide security laws – which one legislator on Thursday referred to as “the most controversial [issue] in Hong Kong since the handover” – has brought on such outrage.

The BBC’s China correspondent, Robin Brant, says that what makes the scenario so incendiary is that Beijing can merely bypass Hong Kong’s elected legislators and impose the modifications.

China can place them into Annex III of the Basic Law, which covers nationwide legal guidelines that should then be carried out in Hong Kong – both by laws, or decree.

Pro-democracy activists worry the law will be used to muzzle protests in defiance of the freedoms enshrined within the Basic Law, as related legal guidelines in China are used to silence opposition to the Communist Party.

What have opponents of China’s transfer stated?

A quantity of pro-democracy figures in Hong Kong, together with Democratic Party chief Wu Chi-wai, stated the announcement was the loss of life of “one country, two systems”.

Civic Party lawmaker Dennis Kwok stated “if this move takes place, ‘one country, two systems’ will be officially erased. This is the end of Hong Kong.”

His colleague Tanya Chan added that this was the “saddest day in Hong Kong history”.

Student activist and politician Joshua Wong tweeted that the transfer was an try by Beijing to “silence Hong Kongers’ critical voices with force and fear”.

Meanwhile, the US state division stated that “any effort to impose national security legislation that does not reflect the will of the people of Hong Kong would be highly destabilising, and would be met with strong condemnation”.

President Donald Trump stated the US would react strongly if China adopted by with its proposals, with out giving particulars.

The US is presently contemplating whether or not to increase Hong Kong’s preferential buying and selling and funding privileges. It should resolve by the end of the month.

China security law 'could be end of Hong Kong'

Media playback is unsupported in your system

Media captionFormer Hong Kong governor Chris Patten: “UK should tell China this is outrageous”

The final British governor of Hong Kong, Chris Patten, referred to as the transfer a “comprehensive assault on the city’s autonomy”.

A spokesperson for the British Foreign Office stated that the UK anticipated China “to respect Hong Kong’s rights and freedoms and high degree of autonomy”.

What is China’s place?

Sources on the National People’s Congress (NPC) have stated that Beijing can now not watch for Hong Kong to cross its personal law, nor can it proceed to look at the expansion of what it sees as a violent anti-government motion.

One supply informed the South China Morning Post: “We can no longer allow acts like desecrating national flags or defacing of the national emblem in Hong Kong.”

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Zhang Yesui pronounces the transfer forward of the opening of the NPC

Beijing can also worry September’s elections to Hong Kong’s legislature. If final yr’s success for pro-democracy events in district elections is repeated, authorities payments may probably be blocked.

Announcing the transfer on Thursday, spokesman Zhang Yesui gave little away, saying the measure would “improve” on one nation, two programs.

Mr Zhang stated: “National security is the bedrock underpinning the stability of the country. Safeguarding national security serves the fundamental interest of all Chinese, our Hong Kong compatriots included.”

  • Profile: Carrie Lam, Chief Executive of Hong Kong
  • Hong Kong’s yr in seven intense feelings

After debating the problem, the NPC – usually a rubber stamp – will vote on it subsequent week. The matter would then not advance till June, when it goes earlier than the Standing Committee.

An editorial within the state-run China Daily stated the law meant that “those who challenge national security will necessarily be held accountable for their behaviour”.

In Hong Kong, the pro-Beijing DAB celebration stated it “fully supported” the proposals, which had been made “in response to Hong Kong’s rapidly worsening political situation in recent years”.

Pro-Beijing lawmaker Christopher Cheung informed Reuters: “Legislation is necessary and the sooner the better.”

What is Hong Kong’s authorized scenario?

Hong Kong was dominated by Britain as a colony for greater than 150 years as much as 1997.

The British and Chinese governments signed a treaty – the Sino-British Joint Declaration – that agreed Hong Kong would have “a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs”, for 50 years.

This was enshrined within the Basic Law, which runs out in 2047.

As a outcome, Hong Kong’s personal authorized system, borders, and rights – together with freedom of meeting and free speech – are protected.

But Beijing has the power to veto any modifications to the political system and has, for instance, dominated out direct election of the chief govt.

China security law 'could be end of Hong Kong'

Media playback is unsupported in your system

Media captionUproar on Monday in Hong Kong’s legislature

Hong Kong noticed widespread political protests in 2019 however these turned a lot smaller in the course of the coronavirus outbreak.

However, there have been chaotic scenes in Hong Kong’s legislative chamber on Monday, when a quantity of pro-democracy lawmakers had been dragged out throughout a row a few invoice that may make it unlawful to disrespect the nationwide anthem.

A bunch of 15 distinguished pro-democracy activists additionally appeared in courtroom on Monday charged with organising and collaborating in illegal assemblies associated to final yr’s protests.

Source link